qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] target-arm: v7M: ignore writes to CONTROL.SPSEL f


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] target-arm: v7M: ignore writes to CONTROL.SPSEL from Thread mode
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 00:33:03 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

Hi Peter,

On 06/30/2017 08:06 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
For v7M, writes to the CONTROL register are only permitted for
privileged code. However even if the code is privileged, the
write must not affect the SPSEL bit in the CONTROL register
if the CPU is in Thread mode (as documented in the pseudocode
for the MSR instruction). Implement this, instead of permitting
SPSEL to be written in all cases.

This was causing mbed applications not to run, because the
RTX RTOS they use relies on this behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden> > ---
  target/arm/helper.c | 13 ++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 2594faa..4ed32c5 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -8768,9 +8768,16 @@ void HELPER(v7m_msr)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t maskreg, 
uint32_t val)
          }
          break;
      case 20: /* CONTROL */
-        switch_v7m_sp(env, (val & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) != 0);
-        env->v7m.control = val & (R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK |
-                                  R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK);
+        /* Writing to the SPSEL bit only has an effect if we are in
+         * thread mode; other bits can be updated by any privileged code.
+         * switch_v7m_sp() deals with updating the SPSEL bit in
+         * env->v7m.control, so we only need update the others.
+         */

I'v been thinking about adding some function like v7m_is_privileged() v7m_is_thread_mode() !v7m_exception_pending() to ease code readability, like armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception() or is_singlestepping().
Not much inspired yet :(

+        if (env->v7m.exception == 0) {
+            switch_v7m_sp(env, (val & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) != 0);
+        }
+        env->v7m.control &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
+        env->v7m.control |= val & R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
          break;
      default:
          qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "Attempt to write unknown special"


Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>

Regards,

Phil.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]