qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/5] ACPI: move acpi_build_srat_me


From: Andrew Jones
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/5] ACPI: move acpi_build_srat_memory to common place
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:28:37 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:05:46PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
> 
> Move acpi_build_srat_memory to common place so that it could be reused
> by ARM. Rename it to build_acpi_srat_memory.
> 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/acpi/aml-build.c         | 11 +++++++++++
>  hw/i386/acpi-build.c        | 29 +++++------------------------
>  include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 10 ++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> index ab89ca6..f945524 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> @@ -1563,3 +1563,14 @@ build_rsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, GArray 
> *table_offsets,
>      build_header(linker, table_data,
>                   (void *)rsdt, "RSDT", rsdt_len, 1, oem_id, oem_table_id);
>  }
> +
> +void build_acpi_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base,
> +                            uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags 
> flags)
> +{
> +    numamem->type = ACPI_SRAT_MEMORY;
> +    numamem->length = sizeof(*numamem);
> +    numamem->proximity = cpu_to_le32(node);
> +    numamem->flags = cpu_to_le32(flags);
> +    numamem->base_addr = cpu_to_le64(base);
> +    numamem->range_length = cpu_to_le64(len);
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 3c031aa..f939191 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -2427,25 +2427,6 @@ build_tpm2(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker)
>                   (void *)tpm2_ptr, "TPM2", sizeof(*tpm2_ptr), 4, NULL, NULL);
>  }
>  
> -typedef enum {
> -    MEM_AFFINITY_NOFLAGS      = 0,
> -    MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED      = (1 << 0),
> -    MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE = (1 << 1),
> -    MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE = (1 << 2),
> -} MemoryAffinityFlags;
> -
> -static void
> -acpi_build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base,
> -                       uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags flags)
> -{
> -    numamem->type = ACPI_SRAT_MEMORY;
> -    numamem->length = sizeof(*numamem);
> -    numamem->proximity = cpu_to_le32(node);
> -    numamem->flags = cpu_to_le32(flags);
> -    numamem->base_addr = cpu_to_le64(base);
> -    numamem->range_length = cpu_to_le64(len);
> -}
> -
>  static void
>  build_srat(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, MachineState *machine)
>  {
> @@ -2491,7 +2472,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, 
> MachineState *machine)
>      numa_start = table_data->len;
>  
>      numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> -    acpi_build_srat_memory(numamem, 0, 640*1024, 0, MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
> +    build_acpi_srat_memory(numamem, 0, 640*1024, 0, MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
>      next_base = 1024 * 1024;
>      for (i = 1; i < pcms->numa_nodes + 1; ++i) {
>          mem_base = next_base;
> @@ -2507,7 +2488,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, 
> MachineState *machine)
>              mem_len -= next_base - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
>              if (mem_len > 0) {
>                  numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> -                acpi_build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1,
> +                build_acpi_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1,
>                                         MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
>              }
>              mem_base = 1ULL << 32;
> @@ -2515,13 +2496,13 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, 
> MachineState *machine)
>              next_base += (1ULL << 32) - pcms->below_4g_mem_size;
>          }
>          numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> -        acpi_build_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1,
> +        build_acpi_srat_memory(numamem, mem_base, mem_len, i - 1,
>                                 MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
>      }
>      slots = (table_data->len - numa_start) / sizeof *numamem;
>      for (; slots < pcms->numa_nodes + 2; slots++) {
>          numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> -        acpi_build_srat_memory(numamem, 0, 0, 0, MEM_AFFINITY_NOFLAGS);
> +        build_acpi_srat_memory(numamem, 0, 0, 0, MEM_AFFINITY_NOFLAGS);
>      }
>  
>      /*
> @@ -2531,7 +2512,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, 
> MachineState *machine)
>       */
>      if (hotplugabble_address_space_size) {
>          numamem = acpi_data_push(table_data, sizeof *numamem);
> -        acpi_build_srat_memory(numamem, pcms->hotplug_memory.base,
> +        build_acpi_srat_memory(numamem, pcms->hotplug_memory.base,
>                                 hotplugabble_address_space_size, 0,
>                                 MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE |
>                                 MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED);
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> index 2c994b3..a9e8a04 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> @@ -198,6 +198,13 @@ typedef enum {
>      AML_PULL_NONE = 3,
>  } AmlPinConfig;
>  
> +typedef enum {
> +    MEM_AFFINITY_NOFLAGS      = 0,
> +    MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED      = (1 << 0),
> +    MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE = (1 << 1),
> +    MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE = (1 << 2),
> +} MemoryAffinityFlags;
> +
>  typedef
>  struct AcpiBuildTables {
>      GArray *table_data;
> @@ -372,4 +379,7 @@ int
>  build_append_named_dword(GArray *array, const char *name_format, ...)
>  GCC_FMT_ATTR(2, 3);
>  
> +void build_acpi_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base,
> +                            uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags 
> flags);
> +
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.0.4
> 
> 
>

I probably would have just called it 'build_srat_memory', but anyway

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <address@hidden>
 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]