RE: CTABLES

[Charles Johnson]

________________________________
> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:53:41 +0100 
> Subject: Re: CTABLES 
> From: address@hidden 
> To: address@hidden 
> CC: address@hidden; address@hidden;  
> address@hidden; address@hidden;  
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden 
>  
> ok. That means for me, that we should abort the request for CTABLES  
> until the SPV issue is solved. 
>  
> 1. Has anybody a different opinion? 

I think we should take this issue calmly. The SPV format is a way of showing 
the results dynamically allowing it to be edited later form or convert them to 
another format, etc. If it's just a broad topic.
I think the important thing here is to collect information relevant to the 
implementation of CTABLES and also encouraging support for the work that needs 
PSPP project.
Hands who can write code is needed.

> 3. Maybe Frans idea about implementing !Macros could serve as a  
> workaround. I think that might be worthwhile to discuss. Any opinions  
> on that? 

>From my point of view, the implementation of macro is very different and 
>deserves a discussion in itself.
I imagine PSPP priorities are implementing more compatible SPSS commands that 
equate to the basic package. I think at this point, is unproductive talk about 
macros.

CJT