pspp-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: strange...


From: John Darrington
Subject: Re: strange...
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:35:30 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

In that case, are you sure that you're compiling against the mingw
versions of the std library?  

Are you actually compiling on w32 or are you cross compiling?

J'


On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:36:07AM +0200, unknown-1 wrote:
     Hi
     
     In fact this happend with the production version from pspp 0.6.0 as
     donwloaded from the GNU site.
     
     Anybody an idea for a work around?
     
     Have fun
     
     2008/6/15 John Darrington
     I noticed this before when compiling from the CVS tree.  But it
     
     > doesn't appear to happen when compiling from the tarball.  I don't
     > know why.
     >
     > J'
     >
     > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:35:17PM +0200, unknown-1 wrote:
     >     Hi
     >
     >     When I try to  compile pspp-0.6.0 with Mingw on the windows platform 
I
     > get
     >     the errors:
     >
     >     fatal-signal.c: In function `init_fatal_signal_set':
     >     fatal-signal.c:245: warning: implicit declaration of function
     > `sigemptyset'
     >     fatal-signal.c:248: warning: implicit declaration of function
     > `sigaddset'
     >     fatal-signal.c: In function `block_fatal_signals':
     >     fatal-signal.c:259: warning: implicit declaration of function
     > `sigprocmask'
     >     fatal-signal.c:259: error: `SIG_BLOCK' undeclared (first use in this
     >     function)
     >     fatal-signal.c:259: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported 
only
     > once
     >     fatal-signal.c:259: error: for each function it appears in.)
     >     fatal-signal.c: In function `unblock_fatal_signals':
     >     fatal-signal.c:267: error: `SIG_UNBLOCK' undeclared (first use in 
this
     >     function)
     >     make[3]: *** [fatal-signal.lo] Error 1
     >     make[3]: Leaving directory `g:/pspp-0.6.0/gl'
     >
     >     Is this solvable?
     >
     >     Have fun
     >
     >      _______________________________________________
     >     pspp-dev mailing list
     >     address@hidden
     >     http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
     >
     >
     > --
     > PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
     > fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
     > See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
     >
     >
     >
     > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
     > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
     >
     > iD8DBQFIVGZAimdxnC3oJ7MRAjPjAJwMIP4Oabw8pMUC0pOkj9GUJMUxGgCeKgT/
     > w+C25F1MxorCzhV9ju6gp4U=
     > =J2Z3
     > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
     >
     >

     _______________________________________________
     pspp-dev mailing list
     address@hidden
     http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev


-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]