[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: documentation of interest
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: documentation of interest |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:43:29 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 04:03:40PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Production Language. This describes a simple but
> powerful language for graphing. I bet that we'll want
> to implement this at some point--it would make a nice
> backing for a GUI for graphs--although it would be a
> big project too.
>
> I saw this, but haven't looked at it. I thought the acronym was
> chosen rather gratuitously.
I doubt there was anything intentional about it. There's a very
large proprietary software industry out there in which most
people haven't ever heard of GNU or the GPL, believe it or not.
In fact, I have a "GNU" baseball cap and an "EFF" baseball cap
that I used to wear around Stanford's computer science building,
and even here I would get an occasional question about what they
meant.
> * The Tables reference guide. This describes the GUI
> behind the CTABLES command syntax. I've been wrestling
> with how to deal with table output for a while now
> (well, *years*), and this might be nice to look at
> while thinking about that.
>
> Another interesting feature they've come up with recently is a
> programmin API using Python. I thought this might be worth looking
> at, but if we choose to implement it, then I think we should also do
> bindings for guile and perl.
I've started to wonder about that kind of thing too. I don't
think we're ready for anything like that yet, but we're getting
closer. The code is getting cleaner all the time.
--
"Unix... is not so much a product
as it is a painstakingly compiled oral history
of the hacker subculture."
--Neal Stephenson