[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Partysip-dev] Partysip and sipXezPhone running on same machine
From: |
Aymeric Moizard |
Subject: |
Re: [Partysip-dev] Partysip and sipXezPhone running on same machine |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 21:47:43 +0200 (CEST) |
If you get a 200ok, it seems it's working fine?
The rport is an extension for routing response: if rport = 5060,
then there should be no difference between using rport or not...
The issue is not there.
Aymeric
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Jeremy Pullicino wrote:
Hi,
I am running Partysip (windows) with the sipXezPhone SIP client. When I run
the client from a remote PC everything works properly however when I run
Partysip and sipXezPhone from the same machine sipXezPhone fails to register
with the SIP server.
Has anyone seen this before? Why does this happen?
I noticed this difference in the debug logs when I ran sipXezPhone
remotely/locally:
REMOTE:
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.22.208 <http://192.168.22.208>
;branch=z9hG4bK-5723025ddac6645e0b14d858f823b147;rport=5060
From: <sip:address@hidden>;tag=12d75592
To: <sip:address@hidden>;tag=3800020077
Call-ID: beabc5068700389394e7953ef89d6a32
CSeq: 1 REGISTER
Contact: <sip:address@hidden
;LINEID=2544190561dffec7b9b89a35ac2dcbc6>;expires=300
Content-Length: 0
Notice the rport=5060 on the Via header.
LOCAL
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.22.201 <http://192.168.22.201>
;branch=z9hG4bK-7b5b7934f538d058d389ad744653ae94
From: <sip:address@hidden>;tag=57a6535
To: <sip:address@hidden>;tag=1864852982
Call-ID: 9877587ce9be4b7b96b9a67f3977cea8
CSeq: 1 REGISTER
Contact: <sip:address@hidden
;LINEID=76a7004411a2c9bce40071c8dc7a45ce>;expires=300
Content-Length: 0
Notice no rport in the Via header.
If anyone has any pointers I would really appreciate it.
thanks,
Jeremy.