Re: [Partysip-dev] REGARDING SO_REUSEADDR?

[Aymeric Moizard]

You can just bypass this socket option if you don't have it.
Aymeric

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, niv maman wrote:

> Hi.
> First, let me say that your comments helped us a lot, and we almost finished
> the compilation phase.
> Just a reminder we are porting PartySip/OSip to Precise MQX/RTCS RTOS
> (embedded Real time operating system on Motorola 68360)
> This takes time because we are doing our best living PartySip project source
> code as clean as possible.
>
> Now trying to compile udp.c
>
> I notice the use of setsockopt(..SO_REUSEADDR..) 3 times.
> Our problem is that Precise MQX/RTCS do not support SO_REUSEADDR in
> setsockopt(...)
>
> Our project is not using multicast nor ipv6 so that lives me with two lines
> of code where SO_REUSEADDR is used
>
> 1.
> int
> local_ctx_init (int in_port, int out_port)
> {
> .....
> option = 1;
>   i = setsockopt (ctx->in_socket, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR,
>                 OPTVALCAST &option, sizeof option);
>   if (i!=0)
>     {
>       OSIP_TRACE (osip_trace
>                 (__FILE__, __LINE__, OSIP_WARNING, NULL,
>                  "upd plugin; UDP listener SO_REUSE_ADDR failed %i
> (%i)!\n",
>                  ctx->in_port, i));
>     }
> ....
> }
>
> 2.
> Inside udp_plugin_get_new_socke() where it is being called only by code
> fragment enclosed by #ifdef SUPPORT_ICMP which is AFAIK not defined.
>
>
> Can you please comment on those issues or give me an alternative for using
> SO_REUSEADDR.
>
> Really Really Thanks in advance.
>
> Niv The Tool.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Partysip-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/partysip-dev
>