[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?
|
From: |
Travis |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:26:04 -0800 |
Now how did that pesky HTML get in there?
Delivered-To: address@hidden
Received: by 10.142.180.2 with SMTP id c2cs177033wff;
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.5.207 with SMTP id 15mr1820561faw.6.1267826268234;
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:57:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <address@hidden>
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si3434287fks.24.2010.03.05.13.57.47;
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:57:48 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of
address@hidden designates
199.232.76.165 as permitted sender) client-ip=199.232.76.165;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
address@hidden designates
199.232.76.165 as permitted sender)
address@hidden;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) address@hidden
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41903 helo=lists.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1NnfWk-0006m0-Lk
for address@hidden; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:57:46 -0500
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
id 1NnfWW-0006lU-0K
for address@hidden; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:57:32 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59172 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NnfWV-0006lE-EX
for address@hidden; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:57:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
4.60) (envelope-from <address@hidden>) id 1NnfWT-0007oA-T7
for address@hidden; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:57:31 -0500
Received: from web30801.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.200.144]:35231)
by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <address@hidden>) id 1NnfWT-0007o0-Br
for address@hidden; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:57:29 -0500
Received: (qmail 80412 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Mar 2010 21:57:28 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024;
t=1267826248; bh=6gPNXU7aE4OsOfrB3yZ+42ExFleWVB60PbmigXv1XNI=;
h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=mnjLblRO5Iu1CCnFXjVBT52dpZbLhr7L4hqBuwBaJYg2l6hoobvFFzWHj5+mvuUnY0UhRDqt/3K6QiK2uvUfPchMxXFzNERFTObQhr6rWABODSMDTSlc645cCbTpzzJPVUzQiupdZ/NJ5yaFTpikV6z9QBNmEZi7602bHhW5oKE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=cVe2JdEu2MDUhv/L5RQxl1CRr/hh5i18obWEu8fNEcCqd59Eo7lZRSqv9trBqBrJUmEEpuyzFUplUENtLxbbmZfJmfcLn7Ap6XW+U9wgJMc8Iq4nnvQ3SNTr2aVXfeznMsL/x6qUm84HnnBG2o/BwkHujZZyBSexIH0MjcyVgzI=;
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
X-YMail-OSG:
2YSLvlgVM1lx5BoG.hhQ7E2PEZ48kkMv0AUB3HtnzJpRVqP41srKraB_dcNA7Vwtfn05YKsyWm76x13TGu.QQye9Js6.XOV1q3tV1ipPu.Qqhb5yEHXtSi0vv4waDgODfH9loHOEEUR7K75UYZRgxsXwuKQRt.7Pda59pjTQh6U1GAZqP52ldzawf4XJWNI8DKhG_7VyZjF4WaBgsnefkHnSNTx2gZYaHYEaSoF9ZCbmtCPbjGBTXXDOVC7GHmxK5aevinMrCVxhe7_5iHfhV6EFnxBdTZHpi8WBiBlkP0Wgiz3umD8TQsBKwHOcBdJ9zvWbt2UsWzxcG3RUR1gcH6ANR2L2VnUyRiIuixFoG7hpFrR_J5nCxnvkje4ptqHPqWuXhQNa
Received: from [173.81.102.150] by web30801.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:57:28 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/300.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
References: <address@hidden>
<address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:57:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeremy Elliott <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?
To: address@hidden
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1)
X-BeenThere: address@hidden
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: address@hidden
List-Id: pan-users.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users>,
<mailto:address@hidden>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/pan-users>
List-Post: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Help: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users>,
<mailto:address@hidden>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1496308169=="
Sender: address@hidden
Errors-To: address@hidden
--===============1496308169==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="0-1517885886-1267826248=:79979"
--0-1517885886-1267826248=:79979
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Duncan <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Sent: Fri, March 5, 2010 2:58:04 PM
Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?
Jeremy Elliott posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:13:20 -0800 as excerpted:
> Hey, I've looked through the archives, plus tried searching, and can't
> find any instructions on building Pan from source using Windows. I
> thought that I'd saw it before, but can't find it now.
>
> Does anyone have detailed instructions on doing this?
I think one of the guys providing MS executables had some instructions at
one time, but I don't do servantware, haven't for some time, and with
anti-
features such as having to ask MS permission to run, am not likely to as
long as those anti-features remain, so don't have the details.
As much as I agree with you in principle, unfortunately most games don't
work on Linux, so I'm stuck with Windows, since my computer is mostly for
entertainment purposes. It's also kinda tricky getting video files working
on Linux (done it, and remember it wasn't easy getting all the codecs I
needed), so no really easy way to switch just now. Pan doesn't require the
elevation thing, though, except for installing, so at least it's safe there.
> Also, has [there] been any development in the last two years?
> The latest version I'm seeing is 0.133, have their been any changes
> made to the source that would make compiling it worthwhile?
There have been a few patches, tho mostly you'll find them in khaley's git
repo, not in the official upstream gnome pan repo, yet. In particular
there's one that fixes corruption of many-part binaries in some cases. If
you do binaries, you'll likely be interested. If you do only/mostly text
and no many-part binaries (so still images probably won't count, neither
should single-song mp3s, tho whole albums might, and movies of any size
likely will), it's possible you'll not find anything worth bothering with.
I download mostly pics, but for whatever reason, they're still usually
multi-part. I haven't hit the bug you're talking about, though, unless
you're talking about where sometimes a file will say it has errors, but if
you redownload it, it comes through fine. So that one doesn't bother me too
much. Usually the videos I download (TV shows mostly) have .par2 files, so
they correct any other issues.
But AFAIK, at least one of the guys doing MS executables (IIRC there were
two) has been building from the khaley sources, so using his should get
you the patches already. Again, I don't do servantware, so haven't
bothered keeping up with the details.
They might be, but the most recent build for Windoze is the one by Steve
Davies, which is dated 090820, I'm assuming that's August 20, 2009. So I
have no idea if there are updates past that which I'm missing. Thank you for
the answer, though, because it has been very helpful to me, since it
reminded me to check their pages for updates. I had the one which Mr. Davies
had built, so maybe I have most of the patches you mentioned.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
_______________________________________________
Pan-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
--0-1517885886-1267826248=:79979
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV
{margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new
roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:12pt"><br><div style="font-family:
arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><font face="Tahoma"
size="2"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Duncan
<address@hidden><br><b><span style="font-weight:
bold;">To:</span></b> address@hidden<br><b><span style="font-weight:
bold;">Sent:</span></b> Fri, March 5, 2010 2:58:04 PM<br><b><span
style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan
on Windows?<br></font><br>Jeremy Elliott posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010
07:13:20 -0800 as excerpted:<br><br>> > Hey, I've looked through the
archives, plus tried searching, and can't<br>> > find any instructions
on building Pan from source using Windows. I<br>> > thought that I'd
saw it before, but can't find it now.<br>> > <br>> > Does
anyone have detailed instructions on doing this?<br><br>> I think one of
the guys providing MS executables had some instructions at <br>> one
time, but I don't do servantware, haven't for some time, and with
anti-<br>> features such as having to ask MS permission to run, am not
likely to as <br>> long as those anti-features remain, so don't have the
details.<br><br>As much as I agree with you in principle, unfortunately most
games don't work on Linux, so I'm stuck with Windows, since my computer is
mostly for entertainment purposes. It's also kinda tricky getting video
files working on Linux (done it, and remember it wasn't easy getting all the
codecs I needed), so no really easy way to switch just now. Pan doesn't
require the elevation thing, though, except for installing, so at least it's
safe there.<br><br>> > Also, has [there] been any development in the
last two years?<br>> > The latest version I'm seeing is 0.133, have
their been any changes<br>> > made to the source that would make
compiling it worthwhile?<br><br>> There have been a few patches, tho
mostly you'll find them in khaley's git <br>> repo, not in the official
upstream gnome pan repo, yet. In particular <br>> there's one that
fixes corruption of many-part binaries in some cases. If <br>> you
do binaries, you'll likely be interested. If you do only/mostly text
<br>> and no many-part binaries (so still images probably won't count,
neither <br>> should single-song mp3s, tho whole albums might, and movies
of any size <br>> likely will), it's possible you'll not find anything
worth bothering with.<br><br>I download mostly pics, but for whatever
reason, they're still usually multi-part. I haven't hit the bug you're
talking about, though, unless you're talking about where sometimes a file
will say it has errors, but if you redownload it, it comes through fine. So
that
one doesn't bother me too much. Usually the videos I download (TV shows
mostly) have .par2 files, so they correct any other issues.<br><br>> But
AFAIK, at least one of the guys doing MS executables (IIRC there were
<br>> two) has been building from the khaley sources, so using his should
get <br>> you the patches already. Again, I don't do servantware,
so haven't <br>> bothered keeping up with the details.<br><br>They might
be, but the most recent build for Windoze is the one by Steve Davies, which
is dated 090820, I'm assuming that's August 20, 2009. So I have no idea if
there are updates past that which I'm missing. Thank you for the answer,
though, because it has been very helpful to me, since it reminded me to
check their pages for updates. I had the one which Mr. Davies had built, so
maybe I have most of the patches you mentioned.<br><br>-- <br>Duncan - List
replies preferred. No HTML msgs.<br>"Every nonfree program has a
lord, a master --<br>and if you use the program, he is your master."
Richard
Stallman<br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Pan-users
mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:address@hidden";
href="mailto:address@hidden";>address@hidden</a><br><a
href="http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users";
target="_blank">http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users</a><br></div>
</div><br>
</body></html>
--0-1517885886-1267826248=:79979--
--===============1496308169==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Pan-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
--===============1496308169==--
--
Travis in Shoreline Washington
- [Pan-users] Building Pan on Windows?, Jeremy Elliott, 2010/03/05
- [Pan-users] Re: Building Pan on Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/05
- [Pan-users] OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/05
- Re: [Pan-users] OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Alan Meyer, 2010/03/05
- [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Duncan, 2010/03/06
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan on Windows?, Alan Meyer, 2010/03/06
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan onWindows?, Travis, 2010/03/06
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan onWindows?, Alan Meyer, 2010/03/06
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan onWindows?, Joe Zeff, 2010/03/06
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: freedomware vs... Was: Building Pan onWindows?, Rob, 2010/03/06