pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Pan-users] Re: Can I not auto-expand threads?


From: Duncan
Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Can I not auto-expand threads?
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:33:58 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: pan 0.120 (Plate of Shrimp)

walt <address@hidden> posted
address@hidden, excerpted below, on  Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:20:23
+0000:

> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:23:07 +0000, Beartooth wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 05:41:45 +0000, Duncan wrote:
>> 
>>> Your request is reasonable.  I'd suggest you file it as a feature
>>> request for pre-1.1.
> 
>> Hmmm .... Never having done that, I naturally went to pan.rebelbase.com,
>> found a "bug reports" link, and tried to follow that...
> 
> I can't explain your website error (it works for me), but I can point you
> to the right place to file bugs/requests for pan.
> 
> Go to bugzilla.gnome.org and open a new account.  (Apparently gnome.org
> doesn't want bug reports from folks without an email account.)
> 
> Once you have a working account, then you can search for 'pan' in the
> 'Other' category (Hmpf! Hardly a suitable place for a masterpiece like our
> favorite news client...)

The easiest way to enter bugs for pan is to use the menu entry from pan
itself -- Help > Give feedback or report a bug.

> As for Duncan's suggested 'pre-1.1' I don't know what to say.  The pan
> category I've been using for bug reports is 'pre-1.0 betas' and I don't
> see any category which points to future versions.  Cluestick, Duncan?

Hmm... I had seen mention of it set on several bugs, but it looks like
that's the target milestone and not setable by regular reporters, who can
set version but not target milestone.  That's for devs apparently.  (I
hadn't actually tried to use it yet as I've not found any bugs myself
since I started seeing that. =8^)

So it looks like you'd have to set pre-1.0 for the version, and set
enhancement.  Then in the comments say it's target 1.1.  (Charles is
marking all enhancements 1.1 now anyway, I believe, and marking some
things enhancements that might arguably be called bugs too, by way of
defining them as enhancements from what is current and what will be 1.0. 
However, it never hurts to make his bug tracking job easier where possible,
thus giving him more coding time. =8^)

So it looks like I got a bit of the cluestick myself.  =8^)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]