[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?
From: |
George Sherwood |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you? |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:53:34 +0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 22:45:52 +0000 (UTC)
"charles kerr" <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think I'll pass on a release this weekend -- there's nothing
> really new except a small threading speed tweak and maybe 2M
> of memory shaved off the 'top'.
>
> The reason for this slow cycle? Not very many bugs were
> reported this week, and most of them were enhancement requests.
> Either 0.112 is working pretty well, or everyone's burned out
> from the weekly betas.
>
> If it's the former, then RC1 should be the next release IMO.
>
> Charles
Seems to be working okay for me, but I still have the lockup problem
that I described in another message. The problem doesn't exist in
0.111 and only occurs if I do a "Get New Headers for Subscribed
Groups". If I just click into each group and look at new messages that
way, it works fine.
George
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFC8mikVJnfkgKg60RAp7/AJ9SiMwccl/404MbrbQnkq4qtjn0/ACeOYvy
mIQmbjjawkWT4soG2Yy0Dcc=
=2JQA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?, charles kerr, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?, David Kelly, 2006/09/15
- [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Duncan, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?, Darren, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?, Frederic Bezies, 2006/09/16
- Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?,
George Sherwood <=
- [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, walt, 2006/09/16
- [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Duncan, 2006/09/16
- [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Duncan, 2006/09/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, jef_e, 2006/09/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Douglas Bollinger, 2006/09/16
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Douglas Bollinger, 2006/09/16
- [Pan-users] Re: How's 0.112 working for you?, Duncan, 2006/09/17