Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64

[Thomas Stein]

On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:09, Duncan wrote:

> There's a gcc-3.4.6-r1 out with a few bugfixes.  Maybe that is one of
> them?  Something tells me this is likely a bug with 3.4.6, as yeah, 4.1
> might be more efficient, but 1.3 gig compared to 0.3 gig?  That looks like
> a bug to me.

Just installed 3.4.6-r1. Same error.

> Note that gcc is slotted.  You can therefore unmask 4.1.0 and merge it, if
> desired, and use gcc-config/eselect to switch between versions.  I /know/
> 4.1.0 compiles it just fine -- and in less than a third of a gig of
> memory, too! 

Okay, i think i will install gcc 4.1. Thanks so far Duncan.

t.