[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] "missing" articles
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] "missing" articles |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:55:10 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
On Tue 18 Mar 2003 13:51, Alberto BARSELLA posted as excerpted below:
> The problem is not with the articles appearing as "read", but with some
> articles not appearing at all unless I do a "get all headers".
> Is it possible that what you describe also affects "get new headers"?
> I mean: it yesterday's count was 10000 and today's 11000, I suppose that
> pan will download as "new headers" from 10001 to 11000. In this case,
> if one server is lagging behind (say by 500 articles), when switching to
> it there are 500 articles which will never be downloaded.
That's what I meant but I guess that's NOT what I said, eh?
IOW, PAN thinks the messages have already been read and deleted, because all
it sees is the last-message number, I'd guess. Therefore, when messages come
in previous to that number, it doesn't d/l them or show them to you, because
it thinks you already saw them and dispensed with them. (I mean appeared as
read in that sense, not marked as read, I guess.)
--
Duncan
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
- [Pan-users] "missing" articles, Alberto BARSELLA, 2003/03/18
- Re: [Pan-users] "missing" articles, Duncan, 2003/03/18
- Re: [Pan-users] "missing" articles, Alberto BARSELLA, 2003/03/18
- Re: [Pan-users] "missing" articles,
Duncan <=
- Re: [Pan-users] "missing" articles, Duncan, 2003/03/18
- Re: [Pan-users] "missing" articles, Brian Morrison, 2003/03/18
- Re: [Pan-users] "missing" articles, Duncan, 2003/03/19
- Re: [Pan-users] "missing" articles, J.B. Moreno, 2003/03/19
- Re: [Pan-users] "missing" articles, Brian Morrison, 2003/03/20