[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?
From: |
Wolf J . Flywheel |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:32:48 -0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 11 April 2002 22:41, Charles Kerr wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 02:14:10AM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> > Developers are wizards. How can they actually learn something
> > useful from this error message? :-)
> And who writes those error messages? Developers. ;)
Reminds me of an error message from LaTeX, that says its capacity has
been exceeded, and you can "ask a wizard to enlarge me." :)
- --
// Carl Hudkins :: ICQ 5723399 :: PGP 50238D9E
//
// "When two hydrogen atoms love each other very much,
// they bond with an oxygen atom..." --Trance Gemini, Andromeda
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8tmNxlLp/6lAjjZ4RAhH3AKC5KPwZXdzgp0IUFc30XeEP5+D5jgCfdVr7
PTPt/cDqbqbO7sWWTGMcFPM=
=TpfC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?, Frank Van Damme, 2002/04/11
- Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?, Charles Kerr, 2002/04/11
- Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?, Frank Van Damme, 2002/04/11
- Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?, Colin Leroy, 2002/04/11
- Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?, Charles Kerr, 2002/04/11
- Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?,
Wolf J . Flywheel <=
- Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?, Frank Van Damme, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?, Colin Leroy, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?, Charles Kerr, 2002/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] uhm... still gtk issue?, Colin Leroy, 2002/04/12