openexr-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Openexr-devel] OpenEXR support for windows


From: Nick
Subject: Re: [Openexr-devel] OpenEXR support for windows
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 18:32:03 -0700

OpenEXR issues are tracked at https://github.com/openexr/openexr/issues

The Cmake system is still under construction, it seems currently most stable on Linux and OSX. Nonetheless I don't see the specific issue you mention as a currently tracked bug, so it is probably worth your while to open an issue with the problems you are encountering, in terms of actual error messages for people to work from.

Hope this helps,

- Nick


> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:02:32 -0500
> From: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [Openexr-devel] OpenEXR support for windows
>
> Is there any plan to support windows again?
>
> I haven't use OpenEXR for a while and when I came back to it I noticed
> there was a lot of effort put forth as to why visual studio should be
> dropped. My issue is that I need it as a 3rd party library and didn't
> really want to fight with a broken cmake implementation. When I first
> used it I could fire up the solution, build it and move on to the stuff
> I was actually doing. Before anyone starts defending the broken stuff.
> I have no problem running ilmbase through cmake, building it and moving
> on. When I try to do anything with the mess that is OpenEXR I get
> nothing but errors... that ISN'T windows support... that is all but
> admitting that you don't support it.
>
> For anyone wondering I am working with OpenVDB... but they use EXR. I
> would be much happier coding volume data than combing through cmake's vomit.
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openexr-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]