Re: [Openexr-devel] boost versions

[Christopher Horvath]

Assuming C++11 is being used for the "tr1" stuff that boost provides, the big dependency that's difficult to shake is boost::python. It's absolutely wonderful for what it does, elegant and lightweight.  I've tried swig as an alternative, and it's okay, but boost::python is definitely nicer.

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Richard Addison-Wood <address@hidden> wrote:

Personally, I would recommend avoiding any dependencies on boost.

On 18/08/12 11:41 AM, Piotr Stanczyk wrote:

Hi,

Out of interest, what boost version are people using most commonly? Anyone hitting the dizzy heights of 1.50?

Cheers,

Piotr

_______________________________________________
Openexr-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel

--
I think this situation absolutely requires that a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part. And we're just the guys to do it.