octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RC1 Candidate


From: Anadi Kashyap
Subject: Re: RC1 Candidate
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:59:23 +0530

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:21 AM Andrew Janke <address@hidden> wrote:


On 1/28/19 12:32 AM, Anadi Kashyap wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:56 AM Andrew Janke <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>
>     $ brew tap octave-app/octave-app-bases
>                                                        master
>     ==> Tapping octave-app/octave-app-bases
>     Cloning into
>     '/usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Taps/octave-app/homebrew-octave-app-bases'...
>     remote: Enumerating objects: 180, done.
>     remote: Counting objects: 100% (180/180), done.
>     remote: Compressing objects: 100% (106/106), done.
>     [...]
>
>     Cheers,
>     Andrew
>
> Welp, guess it's just me then.
>
> Wow I checked again and I was typing octave-app-base and not bases :/
> Thanks for the info. Also, had to uninstall suite-sparse to do the brew
> install part. Is it normal?

That is not normal. suite-sparse is one of the dependencies of
octave-octave-app, so it should be fine, and in fact required. Perhaps
you had a customized variant of suite-sparse installed? Or maybe you had
installed the OpenBLAS version of suite-sparse from the dpo/openblas tap
at https://github.com/dpo/homebrew-openblas? Because the dpo/openblas
formulae use the same names as core formulae, that could cause conflicts.

Cheers,
Andrew

Yes indeed, I had installed the openblas version installed because homebrew didn't have sundials27 which was needed to resolve some error I was getting during configure.. I guess that installing from openblas might have caused that.  

Anyways, I got the same results as you did on my macOS Mojave 10.14:

Summary:

  PASS                            15462
  FAIL                                4
  XFAIL (reported bug)               43
  SKIP (missing feature)             48
  SKIP (run-time condition)          29


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]