[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4? |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Apr 2018 17:48:12 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 20:38:42 -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
> Is Qt5 required now for a fully functional build? It seems so, as the new
> off-screen printing and help features rely on Qt5 features, correct? If so,
> maybe it is time to check only for Qt5 by default, and not check for Qt4
> unless it is explicitly requested on the configure command line?
No, this is not correct. The current stable branch builds with Qt 4.8,
and I think also 4.6. Yes, the offscreen GL rendering support will be
disabled. I think Qt 4.8 supports all of the classes needed for the new
documentation browser, but I have not tested it yet.
I do understand and have helped people debug the confusing situation
when a mix of Qt 5 and 4 packages are installed, but I don't think the
automatic fallback to Qt 4 should be dropped for Octave 4.4.
--
mike
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, John W. Eaton, 2018/04/02
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?,
Mike Miller <=
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, John W. Eaton, 2018/04/03
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, Mike Miller, 2018/04/03
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, John W. Eaton, 2018/04/03
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, Sebastian Schöps, 2018/04/06
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2018/04/06
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, Sebastian Schöps, 2018/04/06
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2018/04/06
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2018/04/06
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, John W. Eaton, 2018/04/06
- Re: Begin phasing out support for Qt 4?, John W. Eaton, 2018/04/04