Re: Implementing AbsTol for quadcc

[Marco Caliari]

On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:31:39 -0700
Rik <address@hidden> wrote:

> How do people feel about making this change?  Should I default it to using
> [RelTol AbsTol] so existing code can run unmodified?  I'd prefer not to
> since the interface would then differ from the other quad routines.  Should
> there be a warning in place for two versions of Octave when the single
> tolerance syntax is used informing the user that this value will now be
> used for AbsTol rather than RelTol?

Yes, maybe with the hint on how to disable that specific warning.

> Should the AbsTol default to something
> more sensible than 0, such as 1e-10 which is what quadgk uses?

Yes, this is the default in integral?, too.

Marco