Re: "hidden" public package functions

[Julien Bect]

Le 19/06/2017 à 17:18, Julien Bect a écrit :
> > That's my suggestion. If you leave them out of INDEX, or comment them,
> > there'll be no duplicate checking for them. Well, that wouldn't be
> > fatal in this case, probably. But it's not ideal.
>
> Certainly not fatal, since all functions in the stk package start with 
> the stk_ prefix.
>
> So, as long as having *all* public functions and classes listed in the 
> INDEX is not mandatory for OF release, I prefer to leave things as 
> they are.
>
> Not ideal, I agree.  What would be ideal would be to have namespaces 
> in Octave ;-)

Oooops, I just found that we *do* have namespaces in Octave 4.2.1 at 
least...