|
From: | Rik |
Subject: | Re: documentation images created with gnuplot |
Date: | Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:25:08 -0700 |
On 09/23/2016 09:00 AM,
address@hidden wrote:
I doubt it was intentional. The plots should be created with qt these days. If you check one of the m-files in doc/interpreter that creates the images you will find the set_graphics_toolkit function which is quoted below. ## This function no longer sets the graphics toolkit; That is now done ## automatically by C++ code which will ordinarily choose 'qt', but might ## choose gnuplot on older systems. Only a complete lack of plotting is a ## problem. function set_graphics_toolkit () if (isempty (available_graphics_toolkits ())) error ("no graphics toolkit available for plotting"); elseif (! strcmp ("gnuplot", graphics_toolkit ()) ... && ! __have_feature__ ("OSMESA")) if (! any (strcmp ("gnuplot", available_graphics_toolkits ()))) error ("no graphics toolkit available for offscreen plotting"); else graphics_toolkit ("gnuplot"); endif endif endfunction Generally, 'qt' will be selected. However, if the build that created the tarball was done on some remote server that didn't have OSMESA then the toolkit would be switched to gnuplot. --Rik |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |