[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ltfat 2.1.2 released
From: |
Marco Atzeri |
Subject: |
Re: ltfat 2.1.2 released |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:34:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 |
On 17/03/2016 20:32, Zdenek Prusa wrote:
ltfat 2.1.2 has been released.
<http://downloads.sourceforge.net/octave/io-2.4.1.tar.gz?download>http://downloads.sourceforge.net/octave/ltfat-2.1.2.tar.gz?download
User visible changes can be found here
http://octave.sourceforge.net/ltfat/NEWS.html
As a bonus, here is a link to our external documentation
http://ltfat.github.io/doc/
Enjoy
Zdenek
The test documentation seems not available.
http://ltfat.github.io/doc/testing/test_demos.html
Moreover if I try to test with the expected
pkg load ltfat
__run_test_suite__ ({'/usr/share/octave/packages/ltfat-2.1.2'}, {})
pkg unload all
the output is disappointing:
---------------------------------------------------------
Files with no tests:
/usr/share/octave/packages/ltfat-2.1.2/auditory/Contents.m
/usr/share/octave/packages/ltfat-2.1.2/auditory/audfiltbw.m
/usr/share/octave/packages/ltfat-2.1.2/auditory/auditoryinit.m
/usr/share/octave/packages/ltfat-2.1.2/auditory/audspace.m
/usr/share/octave/packages/ltfat-2.1.2/auditory/audspacebw.m
...
/usr/share/octave/packages/ltfat-2.1.2/test_all_ltfat.m
----------------------------------------------------------
nor test_all_ltfat.m seems more effective.
How should I test the package ?
Different question,
am I wrong or the "pkg build / install" takes a considerable time of
perl execution ? I suppose for the documentation.
It takes so long on cygwin compared to other packages that I was worried
my perl package was broken.
Regards
Marco