[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s
From: |
Carlo De Falco |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:25:37 +0000 |
Hi,
On 7 Mar 2016, at 09:45, Richard Crozier <address@hidden> wrote:
> I do wonder if fully implementing, and thoroughly testing a good, ML
> compatible version of ode15s isn't a fairly substantial project on it's own,
> but you'll have a much better idea of the work involved in this.
Sorry, I got confused by too many negations ;)
Do you believe the proposed project is too hard or that it is not enough?
c.
- GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Richard Crozier, 2016/03/05
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Nir Krakauer, 2016/03/05
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Sebastian Schöps, 2016/03/05
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Richard Crozier, 2016/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Sebastian, 2016/03/06
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Richard Crozier, 2016/03/07
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s,
Carlo De Falco <=
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Richard Crozier, 2016/03/07
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Carlo De Falco, 2016/03/07
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Carlo De Falco, 2016/03/07
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Richard Crozier, 2016/03/08
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Carlo De Falco, 2016/03/08
- Message not available
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Nir Krakauer, 2016/03/07
- Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Carlo De Falco, 2016/03/07
Re: GSoC 2016 project idea - implementation of ode15s, Parsiad Azimzadeh, 2016/03/07