octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 4.0.1-rc3 candidate on Windows (was Re: 4.0.1-rc2, candidate)


From: JohnD
Subject: RE: 4.0.1-rc3 candidate on Windows (was Re: 4.0.1-rc2, candidate)
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:48:30 -0500


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Heimlich [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 1:54 AM
> To: John Donoghue; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: 4.0.1-rc3 candidate on Windows (was Re: 4.0.1-rc2, candidate)
> 
> On 20.01.2016 02:28, John Donoghue wrote:
> > On 01/19/2016 05:04 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:04:09 +0100
> >> From: Oliver Heimlich<address@hidden> To:address@hidden
> >> Subject: Re: 4.0.1-rc3 candidate on Windows (was Re: 4.0.1-rc2
> >>     candidate)
> >> Message-ID:<address@hidden>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> > ......
> >
> > Many appear to be already reported issues:
> 
> Thanks for cross-checking. I have compared the package results with the
> last assessment for the 4.0.0 release [1].  There are no new failures,
> so the Windows build should be fine except for the icon (bug #46758).
> 
> Oliver
> 
> 
> [1]
> http://wiki.octave.org/wiki/index.php?title=Octave-
> Forge&oldid=6422#GNU_Octave_4.0_compatibility_assessment

I've been meaning to update the compatibility assessment page with results.

Using a 4.0.0-rc3 compiled for Win64, the results are basically the same, 
although 
Main differences:
tisean doesn’t get stuck and instead has 143 passes, 10 fails.
Octcdf fails - octcdf-1.1.8\nctest.m octave_base_value::print (): wrong type 
argument 'ncfile'

 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]