Re: Mac OS Binary

[c.]

On 9 Nov 2015, at 22:49, Sebastian Schöps [via Octave] <address@hidden> wrote:

> Dear all, 
> 
> Carlo and I successfully created a few mac application bundles for 10.9-10.11 
> at OctConf. I could upload some test builds but before we need to check if 
> all dependencies have proper licenses. Can anyone help me in confirming the 
> licenses of the following dependencies? Possibly somebody did this already? 
> 
> arpack - bsd 
> glpk - gnu 
> jpeg - ??? 
> pcre - bsd 
> readline - gnu 
> epstool - ??? 
> gmp - gnu 
> libmpc - gnu 
> pkg-config - gnu 
> sip - gnu 
> fftw - gnu 
> gnu-sed - gnu 
> libpng - gnu compatible 
> plotutils - gnu 
> suite-sparse - gnu 
> fontconfig - ??? 
> gnuplot - gnu 
> libtiff  - ???? 
> pstoedit - gnu 
> szip - ??? 
> freetype - gpl 
> graphicsmagick - gnu compatible 
> libtool - gnu 
> pyqt - gnu 
> tbb - gnu 
> gcc - gnu 
> hdf5 - ??? 
> little-cms2 - mit 
> qhull - mit 
> veclibfort - Boost 
> gd - ??? 
> imagemagick - gnu compatible 
> lua - mit 
> qrupdate - gnu 
> xz - public domain / gnu 
> ghostscript - gnu? 
> isl - mit 
> mpfr - gnu 
> qscintilla2 - gnu 
> gl2ps - gnu 
> jbig2dec - gnu 
> octave - gnu 
> qt - gnu 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Sebastian 


Hi all, 

this checking of all licenses is a very boring and time consuming task, 
I was wondering, how was this handled in mxe-octave for the windows binaries?

c.