[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
statistics package more suitable for nlinfit et al.? (was: Re: nlinfit i
From: |
Olaf Till |
Subject: |
statistics package more suitable for nlinfit et al.? (was: Re: nlinfit in octave) |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:35:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
After some modifications and fixes to docs and demo, and a
modification in the way weighted residuals are computed, nlinfit.m is
now ready for inclusion into Octave Forge, as are statset.m,
statget.m, and __all_stat_opts__.m.
Do we want the degree in Matlab compatibility to have these functions
in the statistics package, which corresponds to the 'correct' Matlab
package? It would make the statistics package depend on the optim
package, since nlinfit wraps nonlin_curvefit and curvefit_stat.
Olaf
--
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: nlinfit in octave, Asma Afzal, 2015/08/14
- Re: nlinfit in octave, John W. Eaton, 2015/08/14
- Re: nlinfit in octave, Asma Afzal, 2015/08/14
- Re: nlinfit in octave, Olaf Till, 2015/08/15
- Re: nlinfit in octave, Asma Afzal, 2015/08/16
- Re: nlinfit in octave, Olaf Till, 2015/08/16
- Re: nlinfit in octave, Asma Afzal, 2015/08/17
- statistics package more suitable for nlinfit et al.? (was: Re: nlinfit in octave),
Olaf Till <=
- Re: statistics package more suitable for nlinfit et al.?, Julien Bect, 2015/08/20
- Message not available
- Re: statistics package more suitable for nlinfit et al.? (was: Re: nlinfit in octave), Nir Krakauer, 2015/08/19
- Re: statistics package more suitable for nlinfit et al.? (was: Re: nlinfit in octave), Olaf Till, 2015/08/20