[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?
From: |
Carnë Draug |
Subject: |
Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:09:33 +0100 |
On 28 April 2015 at 10:59, chechu <address@hidden> wrote:
> Good morning everyone,
>
> During last week we have built mxe-octave on three different linux
> environments, using the suggestions from mxe-octave wiki and
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?43319
> i#comment 13.
> We are trying to use image package with 64bit indexing on Linux.
>
> On mxe-octave stable-branch we can't build image 2.4.0; it needs octave
> 4.0.0>=
> We have not succeded on those builds, the problem remains, maybe we have
> done something wrong. We are not succeeding on Linux 64bit addressing with
> image package without "modifying" the includes containing the "typos" that
> fail, either with mxe-octave :(
>
> Any suggestions? Thanks so much in advance.
I have just pushed a commit to the image package that may make it
installable. Can you make a clone of the image package (stable branch)
and see if it builds?
Alternatively, apply the following changeset to your image package
http://hg.code.sf.net/p/octave/image/rev/9971d3d64673
Carnë
- Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?, Chechu Garguez, 2015/04/16
- Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?, Chechu Garguez, 2015/04/20
- Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?, Philip Nienhuis, 2015/04/20
- Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?, chechu, 2015/04/28
- Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?,
Carnë Draug <=
- Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?, chechu, 2015/04/28
- Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?, chechu, 2015/04/29
- Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?, Carnë Draug, 2015/04/30
- Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?, chechu, 2015/04/30
- Re: Is --enable-64 still experimental?, Carnë Draug, 2015/04/30