octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages


From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Subject: Re: Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 22:17:15 +0900 (JST)

--- Julien Bect wrote:
> Le 11/04/2015 08:59, Julien Bect a écrit :
> > Le 11/04/2015 01:49, Oliver Heimlich a écrit :
> >>> stk 2.2.0    - OK
> >> PASS 576, FAIL 348 (many failed because of undefined variables)
> >> 82 (of 222) .m files have no tests.
> > 
> > Ouch, that is a very high number of failing tests :((
> > 
> > I have never seen any "undefined variables" failure before and the tests 
> > results sent by JohnD for 4.0.0rc2 32 bits show no failure for STK.
> > 
> > So, this must be a Win7/64bits-specific problem, then...
> > 
> > I don't have access to a Win7/64bits box at home, but I will be able to 
> > test next week (hopefully on 4.0.0rc3, if the installer has been released 
> > by then). 
> 
> Thanks Oliver for uploading your logs.
> 
> Here is a typical example of the test failures you get with Octave 4.0rc2 
> under Win7/64bits:
> 
> ***** shared x t u
> t = rand(3, 2);
> x = stk_dataframe(t);
> !!!!! shared variable initialization failed
> 
> ***** test u = apply(x, 1, @sum);
> !!!!! test failed
> 'x' undefined near line 2 column 12
> 
> ***** assert (isequal(u, sum(t, 1)))
> !!!!! test failed
> 'u' undefined near line 2 column 17
> 
> ...
> 
> Could you please try to see if there's anything wrong with the code in my 
> %!shared block ?
> 
> pkg load stk
> t = rand (3, 2);
> x = stk_dataframe (t);
> 
> Otherwise, does anybody have any idea about why this fails ? Is there 
> anything wrong with the way I use %!shared and %!test blocks ?
> 
> Finally, I can see on the wiki, in the last column : "Tests don't cleanup 
> temporary files". What does it mean ? How do you see that in the log ?
> 
> @++

Julien

Just information, windows binary of 4.0.0-rc3 was uploaded on the alpha ftp 
site.

Tatsuro



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]