|
| From: | dkeck |
| Subject: | Re: New package |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jul 2014 05:56:05 -0700 (PDT) |
I'd like to know who is responsible for Octave in this field (John W. Eaton alone?). gumlym wrote > Couldn’t I have a different license for that? in the GPLv3 * > exceptions * > can be added. Cant that be done? In the help file [1] I found its already answered that exceptions such as 'GPL linking exception' or 'Multi-licensing' will not be done to allow linking to proprietary software (e.g. to CUDA). But if this strong decision wasn't made who would then be in charge of ratifying such *exceptions* for the GNU Octave project? [1] http://wiki.octave.org/FAQ#I_wrote_a_program_that_links_with_Octave_libraries_and_I_don.27t_want_to_release_it_under_the_terms_of_the_GPL._Will_you_change_the_license_of_the_Octave_libraries_for_me.3F -- View this message in context: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/New-package-tp4665192p4665703.html Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |