[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distributing unstable Windows binaries
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: Distributing unstable Windows binaries |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:24:15 +0200 |
On 14 Jul 2014, at 10:59, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I think the main issue with distributing unstable binaries is that they are,
> well ... unstable ;)
> It's true that the more people use the pre-release version the more (possibly
> useful) bug reports
> can be produced, but if new binaries are not produced often, these reports
> are probably going to be
> about the same bugs which are not being fixed over and over again.
> Maybe if someone could find a way to automate production of nightly snapshot
> builds that would change,
> but then we might sometimes get nightly builds that fail or introduce new
> bugs.
>
> just my .2€
>
> c.
Actually, all arguments that have been put forward in this discussion, seem to
me as good reasons
for making more releases more often rather than for distributing "unstable"
binaries.
c.
Re: Distributing unstable Windows binaries, magnesj, 2014/07/21