octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: compilable gui-release revision?


From: Torsten
Subject: Re: compilable gui-release revision?
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:59:56 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

On 23.06.2014 21:46, Mike Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 21:43:08 +0200, Torsten wrote:
>> On 23.06.2014 21:19, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Olaf Till <address@hidden
>>> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Can someone tell me a recent revision of gui-release which compiled
>>>     for him? (0a66861d8069 from 22/06/2014 15:42 does not compile for me.)
>>>
>>>     Olaf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Seems to work for me:
>>> <<<<
>>> ...
>>> Octave successfully built.  Now choose from the following:
>>>
>>>    ./run-octave    - to run in place to test before installing
>>>    make check      - to run the tests
>>>    make install    - to install (PREFIX=/usr/local)
>>>
>>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/d2/home/dima/src/octave'
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/d2/home/dima/src/octave'
>>> address@hidden octave]$ hg head
>>> changeset:   18854:0a66861d8069
>>> branch:      gui-release
>>> tag:         tip
>>> parent:      18848:b314efd58072
>>> user:        Torsten <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
>>> date:        Sun Jun 22 15:42:00 2014 +0200
>>> summary:     implementation of search in selection in gui editor (bbug
>>> #41196)
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>
>> Maybe you need to bootstrap and configure due to changes in the ac-files.
> 
> I have not tried building, but rev 0a66861d8069 looks a little
> suspicious in that it declares slots in the find_dialog class that are
> then conditionally compiled depending on the Qscintilla version. If
> the slots are always declared, they should always be defined as well,
> and the ifdef be inside the function body if needed.
> 

Oops, you are completely right. I forgot the ifdefs in the header file.

Torsten





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]