[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
revive compare_plot_demos
From: |
Andreas Weber |
Subject: |
revive compare_plot_demos |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:36:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 |
Dear maintainers,
due to the many bug reports related to printing plots and regressions in
plotting demos I would like to revive
http://octave.sourceforge.net/compare_plots/
Here is the initial posting from Sören:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Comparing-plots-to-Matlab-td3068200.html
And this is the last proposed patch from Ben I could found (which was,
to my knowledge, never applied):
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/demo-syntax-and-using-dump-demos-to-compare-to-ML-tp4316479p4319733.html
Because it's difficult to compare the plots automatically I think a cool
feature would be a rating function where users can give points for each
gnuplot, fltk (and qt in the future) and submit it at the end. For
example 10 points is as good as or even better as matlab, 0 points is
absolutely useless or an empty plot.
What do you think?
-- Andy
- revive compare_plot_demos,
Andreas Weber <=
- Re: revive compare_plot_demos, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/21
- Re: revive compare_plot_demos, Ben Abbott, 2014/06/21
- Re: revive compare_plot_demos, Andreas Weber, 2014/06/24
- Message not available
- Re: revive compare_plot_demos, Andreas Weber, 2014/06/24
- Re: revive compare_plot_demos, Rik, 2014/06/24
- Re: revive compare_plot_demos, Andreas Weber, 2014/06/29
- Re: revive compare_plot_demos, Michael D. Godfrey, 2014/06/29
- Re: revive compare_plot_demos, Ben Abbott, 2014/06/29
- Re: revive compare_plot_demos, Andreas Weber, 2014/06/29
- Re: revive compare_plot_demos, Ben Abbott, 2014/06/29