[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:32:18 -0500 |
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 17:58 +0100, c. wrote:
> On 19 Nov 2013, at 17:11, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > the main reason is that, although the GUI is a huge difference it is
> > still terribly buggy, at least on OSX where I am testing, I'd prefer
> > a new major release to be more stable.
>
> BTW, although I'm mostly looking at the GUI because, as you say,
> that is a HUGE new feature, problems on OSX 10.9 are not only there,
> I still see ~15 test failures in 'make check'.
We should consider these blocker bugs.
If we can't make this release with the GUI working on Mac OS X and
Windows, then we shouldn't make it at all. The GUI should be our major
release goal.
I'm doing a Octave builds on Mac OS X.VIII and X.V, and I'll start
attacking these bugs.
- Jordi G. H.
- 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Thorsten Liebig, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Robert T. Short, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, John Swensen, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, John Swensen, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/20
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Doug Stewart, 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, c., 2013/11/19
- Re: 4.0 vs 3.8 again, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/11/19