Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m

[PhilipNienhuis]

bpabbott wrote
> Using your scripts, the result doesn't look as bad as what you posted.
<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655825/brug-octave.png> 

Yep; remarkably. I really don't follow why your result is so much better
with the same script.

The plots I posted were the same on Windows and Linux. Does OSX handle
graphics a bit differently?

Did you have the changesets by Panxto & Rik applied as well?


> If I make a slight modification ...
> 
>   margins.top = min (margins.top, margins.row);
>   margins.bottom = min (margins.bottom, margins.row);
>   margins.right = min (margins.right, margins.column);
>   margins.left = min (margins.left, margins.column);
> 
> Then I get a bit more improvement ...
<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655825/brug-octave-modified.png> 
> 
> I think this change would be ok and improve the esthetics. If you agree,
> I'll push a change.

As for me I'd like even higher subplots (less empty space in between), more
like the first ("good") example I posted.
But first I'd like to know how come you get so much different results with
the same script.

Philip




--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/changes-to-graphics-cc-and-subplot-m-tp4655812p4655826.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.