Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m

[PhilipNienhuis]

bpabbott wrote
> I composed a simple test script to compare Matlab and Octave
> 
> clf ()
> subplot (3,1,1)
> plot (rand (3))
> title ({'one', 'two', 'three'})
> xlabel xlabel
> subplot (3,1,2)
> plot (rand (3))
> xlabel xlabel
> subplot (3,1,3)
> xlabel xlabel
> plot (rand (3))
> xlabel xlabel
> 
> The results for Octave and Matlab are at the links below.
<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655822/FLTK.png> 
> 
<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655822/Matlab.png> 
> 
> The results are consistent, but are also more esthetic than your example. 
> Can you provide a short script which I can run through Matlab to see how
> it behaves?
> 
> In any event, I do think the margins between the subplots are too generous
> and can be reduced.

Well it occurred to me that my last Octave build also includes Pantxo's and
Rik's axes patches. 

I tried to backout those but I get something like "uncommitted changes in
subrepo gnulib-hg" :-(
(I'm often at war with mercurial for some reason)
Any hints?

I'll upload a part of the script; it needs a function 'plotbrug.m" (also
attached).

As to esthetics, I've got no opinion.
The script + plot function have been made by a colleague who exclusively
works with Matlab.

Philip

Brug_test.m <http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655824/Brug_test.m>  

plotbrug.m <http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655824/plotbrug.m>  



--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/changes-to-graphics-cc-and-subplot-m-tp4655812p4655824.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.