octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: closed loop control GSoC Design Question


From: Lukas Reichlin
Subject: Re: closed loop control GSoC Design Question
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:35:55 +0200

On 11.06.2013, at 14:06, Doug Stewart <address@hidden> wrote:

> 2)   Should this project be part of the controls package?  I think yes. The 
> controls package would have to be loaded for this SISO program to work.
> 
> Doug

In the long term, yes. In the short/mid term I would prefer to create a 
"sisotool" package dependent on control. The reason is that it allows frequent 
releases (which are very likely in the early stages of development) without 
interfering with the rest of control.

Currently we have a "control" repository [1] for releases and a 
"control-time-delay" repository [2] where Thomas Vasileiou is working on 
integrating time delays. If you need to apply changes to existing control 
functions, you can clone one of the Mercurial repositories [1, 2] and 
experiment with your stuff there.

Lukas


[1]
https://bitbucket.org/paramaniac/control/

[2]
https://bitbucket.org/paramaniac/control-time-delay/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]