octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: gsoc2013 octave audio system


From: Vytautas Jancauskas
Subject: Re: Re: gsoc2013 octave audio system
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:16:07 +0300

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Vytautas Jancauskas wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, pantxo diribarne
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> I also see this warning message on both implementations. It seems to be an
>>> ALSA lib warning when Portaudio initializes communication. It does not mean
>>> that it would not happen if another library than Portaudio tried to
>>> comunicate with ALSA. Did you ever see such messages while using rtaudio?
>>>
>>> Pantxo
>>
>> I did not. I doubt ALSA would take the initiative to output anything
>> to stdout. RtAudio does not output anything remotely similar.
>
> And yet it is ALSA, albeit stderr instead of stdout. See
> snd_lib_error, snd_lib_error_set_handler.
>
> Apparently portaudio used to set the ALSA lib error handler function
> to hide those error messages, but segfaults resulted and so that line
> is now commented out (see http://bugs.debian.org/563192).
>
> --
> mike

I see. Here is my wiki profile
http://wiki.octave.org/User:Bucket_brigade, I also posted my proposal
on melange. I am looking for suggestions on how to improve it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]