[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What about miscellaneous?
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: What about miscellaneous? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:10:37 -0400 |
On 16 April 2013 04:44, Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden> wrote:
> What are you trying to say in relation to the miscellaneous package?
> My plan is to collect the functions on orthogonal polynomials and and
> put them in the secfun package. Do you have an objection to that?
> Note that the specfun package in core already is doing this.
That's fine. I just wanted to make sure that specfun doesn't become
another "miscellaneous".
- Jordi G. H.