Re: Matlab-style code in test/classes

[Julien Bect]

Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso-2 wrote
> I should note that Julien rewrote some of your asserts which 
> were originally three-arg to become single-arg asserts. This
> really is what I wonder if it should stay that way or not.

Yes, I did, for the exact reason that was mentioned above by Bob and Ben :
these tests are useful, among other things, to test that the assertion "if
it runs in MATLAB then it should run in octave" is valid now /and will stay
valid in the future/.

Please note that I'm not at all suggesting that anybody should be "rewriting
Octave code to make sure it runs in Matlab". My point is only about /tests/
(more specifically, the ones that test features which are supposed to belong
to the "Matlab-compatible subset" of Octave).



--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Matlab-style-code-in-test-classes-tp4649207p4649273.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.