Re: saving function handles

[Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso]

On 14 November 2012 12:55, Muhali <address@hidden> wrote:
> But if during the saving of f `foo´ is known from a relative path, e.g. path
> = ... fun ... (instead of path = ... /path/to/fun ...), isn't it more
> logical if only the relative path is saved?

This proposal might make sense, but I don't see how to implement it.
Do you have precise suggestions how to do so? How can we know in
advance if an absolute or a relative path should be used? Why and when
should a relative path be preferred? What should the path be relative
to?

- Jordi G. H.