Re: Renaming libcruft

[John W. Eaton]

On 24-Aug-2012, Michael Goffioul wrote:

| If I may add something, splitting up further will complicate the symbol export
| mechanism.

My proposal is not to split things up further.  It's to merge libcruft
and liboctave.  The multiple divisions that I proposed are just for
internal convenience when building, same as we now use for building
liboctinterp.  These extra convenience libraries are not exposed to
the user.  The user would see only liboctave, liboctinterp, and
liboctgui.

jwe