octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave 3.6.2-rc2 release candidate available for ftp


From: Mike Miller
Subject: Re: Octave 3.6.2-rc2 release candidate available for ftp
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 13:19:53 -0400

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> A new release candidate of Octave 3.6.2 is now available from
> alpha.gnu.org in the directory /gnu/octave:
>
>  cc02bf98ca5b1d7fd755a83151d057fc  octave-3.6.2-rc2.tar.bz2
>  94620ff28d121a85fb2eaa77ec628f67  octave-3.6.2-rc2.tar.gz
>
>  -rw-r--r-- 1 3003 3002 15439246 May 24 19:05 octave-3.6.2-rc2.tar.bz2
>  -rw-r--r-- 1 3003 3002 17995476 May 24 19:08 octave-3.6.2-rc2.tar.gz
>
> The only significant change since the first release candidate is
> to update the shared library version numbers for the release.
>
> This release candidate is -rc2 instead of -rc1 because I noticed some
> problems with the -rc1 version shortly after I uploaded it.  Please
> ignore the -rc1 version.
>
> Even if you have been building Octave regularly from the Mercurial
> archive, it would help if you could build from this release candidate
> and report any problems.  We could especially use reports for Windows
> and OS X systems.

CentOS 5.8 x86_64:

  PASS  10191
  FAIL      2

There were 3 expected failures (see fntests.log for details).

Excerpts from fntests.log:

  ***** assert (sqrtm (2*ones (2)), ones (2), 3*eps)
!!!!! test failed
assert (sqrtm (2 * ones (2)),ones (2),3 * eps) expected
   1   1
   1   1
but got
   1.00000   1.00000
   1.00000   1.00000
maximum absolute error 1.11022e-15 exceeds tolerance 6.66134e-16

  ***** testif HAVE_ARPACK
 s = svds (speye (10));
 assert (s, ones (6, 1), 2*eps);
!!!!! test failed
assert (s,ones (6, 1),2 * eps) expected
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
   1
but got
   1.0000
   1.0000
   1.0000
   1.0000
   1.0000
   1.0000
maximum absolute error 1.11022e-15 exceeds tolerance 4.44089e-16

This is the first time I have built Octave on this dist/arch combination.

No problems with Debian wheezy/sid amd64, CentOS 5.8 i386, or CentOS
6.2 i386 and x86_64.

-- 
mike


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]