octave-maintainers
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: java package
From
:
Júlio Hoffimann
Subject
:
Re: java package
Date
:
Wed, 9 May 2012 17:39:16 -0300
My modest vote is against Java. I'm not an active Octave developer, but i hope to be one someday. C++ builds are complicated enough to deal with.
I prefer the Jordi's approach of making Octave-Forge packages more close to the core.
Regards,
Júlio.
reply via email to
[
Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
Re: java package
,
(continued)
Re: java package
,
John W. Eaton
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
Michael Goffioul
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
John W. Eaton
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
Michael Goffioul
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
John W. Eaton
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
Luke M
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
Carnë Draug
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
John W. Eaton
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
Daniel J Sebald
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
Júlio Hoffimann
<=
Re: java package
,
Robert T. Short
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
John W. Eaton
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
Michael D Godfrey
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
Michael D Godfrey
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
marco atzeri
,
2012/05/09
Re: java package
,
Robert T. Short
,
2012/05/09
Prev by Date:
Re: java package
Next by Date:
Re: java package
Previous by thread:
Re: java package
Next by thread:
Re: java package
Index(es):
Date
Thread