[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: build without gnuplot
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: build without gnuplot |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:15:31 -0400 |
On Apr 24, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Svante Signell
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> What about something like the below (has to be tested of course)
>> [...]
>> Don't know what happens if --enable-docs is given and gnuplot is missing
>> though. Then both tests have to be combined.
>
> Yeah, I can't test anything right now, give me a few hours and I'll be
> able to, but something like
>
> if test -n "$DOCDIR" && test -n "$warn_gnuplot"; then
> DOCDIR=
> warn_docs="some msg about disabling docs because gnuplot not available"
> AC_MSG_WARN([$warn_docs])
> fi
> AM_CONDITIONAL([AMCOND_BUILD_DOCS], [test -n "$DOCDIR"])
>
> This should be able to go anywhere near the end of configure.ac where
> the other warning blobs are. The last line is the same as line 199
> above, I think it's safe to call more than once, or make it a
> relocation of line 199.
>
> --
> mike
If gnuplot is missing, I think the native backend should be used to build the
docs.
Does anyone know if what happens with the current sources ?
Ben
- build without gnuplot, Ben Abbott, 2012/04/24
- Re: build without gnuplot, Ben Abbott, 2012/04/24
- Re: build without gnuplot, Mike Miller, 2012/04/24
- Re: build without gnuplot, Ben Abbott, 2012/04/25
- Re: build without gnuplot, Mike Miller, 2012/04/25
- Re: build without gnuplot, Ben Abbott, 2012/04/25
- Re: build without gnuplot, Ben Abbott, 2012/04/25