[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: .h.in vs .in.h
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: .h.in vs .in.h |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:50:14 -0400 |
On 11-Apr-2012, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| I think it's simply that you can't do:
|
| grep ... *.h
|
| This won't include *.h.in files.
Right, it's easy to miss something.
Anyway, it seems like a safe change to me. But I seem to be missing
details lately so I thought I would ask whether it would bother
anyone if I made this change.
jwe
- .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Michael Goffioul, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11