[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal for new m-file function
From: |
Martin Helm |
Subject: |
Re: proposal for new m-file function |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:31:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 |
Am 22.03.2012 10:43, schrieb Carlo de Falco:
>
>
> 2012/3/22 <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:33:01 -0400
> From: Ben Abbott <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> To: octave maintainers mailing list <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Subject: proposal for new m-file function
> Message-ID: <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> A user's question about fixed points piecewise-linear fitting led
> to the development of a function looks to be a good fit for
> Octave's core.
>
>
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/help-octave/2012-March/050900.html
>
> The idea was to fit a piece-wise polynomial to a set of data.
> After some discussion between myself and Martin Helm, the attached
> ppfit.m was produced. The name was chosen to match the existing
> ppval().
>
> The function provides a least-squares fit of a 1D interpolation
> with specified break positions to a set of data.
>
> Demos and tests are included.
>
> Any concern about adding this to Octave's core ?
>
> Ben
>
>
> googling for the name 'ppfit' I found this function:
>
> https://www.assembla.com/code/zaxxon_scripts/subversion/nodes/trunk/project/scripts/ppfit.m
>
> which seems to do the same as yours with the additional option of
> returning a spline with N continuous derivatives
> Would it be possible to add that option to your code?
> The license of the linked function looks like BSD so it should be no
> problem to get the code from there.
> c.
Wouldn't it be much cleaner to add that additional fitting options
(quadratics and higher order splines) to interp1 (without breaking
matlab compatibility of course)?
I think that is the place where such functionality should naturally
live. I could look at it over the weekend and propose a patch for it.
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Carlo de Falco, 2012/03/22
- Re: proposal for new m-file function,
Martin Helm <=
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/22
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Martin Helm, 2012/03/22
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/22
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Martin Helm, 2012/03/22
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/22
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/23
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Martin Helm, 2012/03/23
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/24
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/25
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2012/03/26