[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:12:08 -0500 |
On Jan 15, 2012, at 8:28 PM, "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 15-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> | I've fixed a bug where bit map output was being saved in the improper size.
> |
> | https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?35307
> |
> | Its not pushed yet, as I'm not sure which branch it should be applied to.
> |
> | If you don't have a preference, I'll push it to default.
>
> Did this feature work correctly in previous versions of Octave, or has
> this bug always been present?
>
> jwe
This bug existed for the entire 3.4.x series. It was introduced when we began
to use gs to convert eps to bitmap formats. The 3.2.x series would have worked
correctly.
Ben
- patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/15
- patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/15
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/29