[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what to do about dependencies?
From: |
Dr. Alexander Klein |
Subject: |
Re: what to do about dependencies? |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 21:00:06 +0100 |
Am 06.01.2012 um 17:36 schrieb John W. Eaton:
> For the future, I think we should consider including at least the
> required dependencies (GNU Readline, PCRE, BLAS+LAPACK (ATLAS?)) and
> all numerical library dependencies (ARPACK, FFTW3, GLPK, Qhull,
> QRUPDATE, and SuiteSparse) with Octave.
John,
I'd give a big thumbs up for including GNU Readline, because it's a constant
pain to have it installed separately on OSX. The libreadline included in OSX is
but a halfway functional wrapper around libedit from BSD. Thus, if you don't
use MacPorts or the like, you're best off keeping libreadline in a separate
path like /usr/local/alternate to prevent it from interfering with the system
libraries, and you have to set flags you'd otherwise never touch.
As for FFTW, I'm not sure whether it's a good idea, because depending on the
CPU, there are many options you can tweak for optimal performance. Can this be
done automatically?
- Alex
--
Dr. Alexander Klein, Diplom-Mathematiker
Physiologisches Institut | TransMIT Zentrum
Raum 543 | für Numerische Methoden
Aulweg 129 | Heinrich-Buff-Ring 44
35392 Giessen | 35392 Giessen
- what to do about dependencies?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/06
- Re: what to do about dependencies?, Alexander Hansen, 2012/01/06
- Re: what to do about dependencies?, Michael D Godfrey, 2012/01/06
- Re: what to do about dependencies?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/01/06
- Re: what to do about dependencies?,
Dr. Alexander Klein <=
- Re: what to do about dependencies?, Søren Hauberg, 2012/01/06
- Re: what to do about dependencies?, Olaf Till, 2012/01/06
- Re: what to do about dependencies?, Thomas Weber, 2012/01/06
- Re: what to do about dependencies?, Orion Poplawski, 2012/01/08
- Re: what to do about dependencies?, Robert T. Short, 2012/01/08