octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: what to do about dependencies?


From: Dr. Alexander Klein
Subject: Re: what to do about dependencies?
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 21:00:06 +0100

Am 06.01.2012 um 17:36 schrieb John W. Eaton:

> For the future, I think we should consider including at least the
> required dependencies (GNU Readline, PCRE, BLAS+LAPACK (ATLAS?)) and
> all numerical library dependencies (ARPACK, FFTW3, GLPK, Qhull,
> QRUPDATE, and SuiteSparse) with Octave.

John,

I'd give a big thumbs up for including GNU Readline, because it's a constant 
pain to have it installed separately on OSX. The libreadline included in OSX is 
but a halfway functional wrapper around libedit from BSD. Thus, if you don't 
use MacPorts or the like, you're best off keeping libreadline in a separate 
path like /usr/local/alternate to prevent it from interfering with the system 
libraries, and you have to set flags you'd otherwise never touch.

As for FFTW, I'm not sure whether it's a good idea, because depending on the 
CPU, there are many options you can tweak for optimal performance. Can this be 
done automatically?

- Alex

-- 
          Dr. Alexander Klein, Diplom-Mathematiker

Physiologisches Institut       |               TransMIT Zentrum
Raum 543                       |        für Numerische Methoden
Aulweg 129                     |          Heinrich-Buff-Ring 44
35392 Giessen                  |                  35392 Giessen



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]