[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for"
From: |
Mark Everitt |
Subject: |
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for" |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:16:40 -0700 (PDT) |
Thanks for those pointers. I'll take a look at the hacking file and clone the
repository when I get a patch of free time.
I guessed that thread safety would not be likely. The plan is to spawn
processes, inspired by parcellfun from octave-forge. This could mean using a
fair amount of memory and general heaviness. As Matlab suffers
like this anyway I don't think that this should be considered much of a
negative.
Let's see what happens...
Cheers,
Mark
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Re-Handling-parfor-as-for-tp3841541p3854416.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Ben Abbott, 2011/09/25
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/26
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/26
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/26
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/27
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/09/27
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/28
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for",
Mark Everitt <=
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Søren Hauberg, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Søren Hauberg, 2011/09/29
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Jussi Lehtola, 2011/09/26