[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: svds test failures
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: svds test failures |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:31:23 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
--- On Mon, 2011/8/8, Marco atzeri wrote:
> On 8/8/2011 5:55 AM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> > The patch
> > 1.7 -%! randn('state',42); % Initialize to make normest function
> >reproducible
> > 1.8 -%! rand('state',42)
> > 1.9 +%! randn ('state', 43); % Initialize to make normest
> >function reproducible
> > 1.10 +%! rand ('state', 43)
> > is origin of the fail.
> Hi Tatsuro,
> so 42 is fine for mingw and 43 for cygwin.
>
> Could you try some of the other near by values that were
> fine on cygwin ?
>
> 35, 37, 40, 41, 43, 45, 46, 49, 50
****The results are
35 OK
36 OK
37 fail
38 OK
39 OK
40 OK
41 OK
42 OK
43 fail
44 OK
45 OK
46 OK
47 OK
48 OK
49 fail
50 OK
Regards
Tatsuro
- Re: svds test failures, (continued)
- Re: svds test failures, Rik, 2011/08/06
- Re: svds test failures, Marco atzeri, 2011/08/07
- Re: svds test failures, Marco atzeri, 2011/08/07
- Re: svds test failures, Rik, 2011/08/07
- Re: svds test failures, Marco atzeri, 2011/08/07
- Re: svds test failures, Rik, 2011/08/07
- Re: svds test failures, Andreas Weber, 2011/08/07
- Re: svds test failures, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2011/08/07
- Re: svds test failures, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2011/08/07
- Re: svds test failures, Marco atzeri, 2011/08/08
- Re: svds test failures,
Tatsuro MATSUOKA <=
- Re: svds test failures, Rik, 2011/08/08
- Re: svds test failures, Liam Groener, 2011/08/08
- Re: svds test failures, Rik, 2011/08/09
- Re: svds test failures, Marco atzeri, 2011/08/09