[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: strread.m
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: strread.m |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Aug 2011 21:27:20 -0400 |
On 2-Aug-2011, Ben Abbott wrote:
| In any event, I still like the idea of a modified sscanf/fscanf. I
| think such a function would find use beyond the current context (but
| that's easy for me to say since I am relying on John to do the
| work).
I'm still willing to work on it, but may need some help understanding
all the complexities of textscan. Unfortunately, I can't promise that
it will happen any time soon as I have limited time for working on
Octave at the moment.
jwe
- Re: strread.m, (continued)
- Re: strread.m, John W. Eaton, 2011/08/02
- Re: strread.m, Philip Nienhuis, 2011/08/02
- Re: strread.m, John W. Eaton, 2011/08/02
- Re: strread.m, Philip Nienhuis, 2011/08/03
- Re: strread.m, John W. Eaton, 2011/08/03
- Re: strread.m, Philip Nienhuis, 2011/08/03
- Re: strread.m, John W. Eaton, 2011/08/04
- xtextscan [WAS: Re: strread.m], Philip Nienhuis, 2011/08/04
- Re: strread.m, Ben Abbott, 2011/08/04
- Re: strread.m, Ben Abbott, 2011/08/02
- Re: strread.m,
John W. Eaton <=
Re: Release goals for 3.6, Konstantinos Poulios, 2011/08/03